FARMER RESPONSE

Accused of being AWOL for approximately 45 out of 102 total days “not present at work” …

RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE:

There had been some minimal conversation and Respondent was aware of the scheduled meeting or hearing. In his mind, however, the March hearing was the same as or similar to the earlier December hearing at which he voluntarily appeared with counsel. What Respondent failed to realize or appreciate was the March hearing required his appearance in person in accordance with the Rule To Show Cause issued pursuant to FJQC Rule 8. On the night of March 27, 2025, Respondent began driving north on I-95 with the intention of driving to Jacksonville. As he drove north he received a series of messages and telephone calls advising him of an ongoing family matter in Broward County at which his presence was being requested. Respondent weighed his options and elected to address the family crisis. Unfortunately, since he had planned on appearing in person at the JQC hearing he had not submitted a written explanation or any written materials. Instead, early on the morning of March 28, 2025, Respondent sent an email/letter to Alexander Williams, General Counsel for the JQC. Mr. Williams has incorporated by reference that email/letter as Exhibit B in the Recommendation of Suspension. In the email/letter Respondent explained that despite his best intentions he wouldn’t be appearing in person due to a family matter that required his attention …

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO NOTICES OF INVESTIGATION:

In response to JQC Notice Of Formal Charges:

42 thoughts on “FARMER RESPONSE”

  1. 5

    0

    Farmers appearance without an attorney was a mistake number one. But stuff does that happen that requires personal attention and I believe him that matter. But I think the JQC were tired of his prior antics or filings that we are not aware of. Usually everyone gets the benefit of the doubt unless you abuse the doubt.
    Farmer you made your bed now sleep in the barn and not the courthouse. (Ala judge mow)

  2. 8

    1

    Has anyone seen the latest filings by Paidowitz? He has lost his mind. What is his endgame?

      1. 5

        0

        Flakowitz is making a case about a guy waving a gun at an unlicensed wedding venue in one of those podunk cities- Davie or SW Ranches and trying to get it to the Supreme Court
        🙄. Tried to use virtual reality too. Wanted virtual reality when the crime was caught on camera. No clue why THIS is the case to go awol on, maybe the penis statute from his last case, hit him in the head?

        1. 5

          0

          Maybe this defendant can help get his wife elected? Or appointed. I mean we have a lot of openings or will soon.

    1. 4

      0

      Everyone knows why they left Lizzie alone but why were the Judges afraid to tell on Farmer for missing so many days??

      1. 0

        2

        They stick together like flies on chit
        If you go after one they think it could be them next
        No lie is too outrageous to keep them at the public trough

      1. 3

        0

        All the part time Judges should be removed to make way for people that want to serve. It’s disgusting how bad some of them are and how the Chief and JQC turn a blind eye.

        1. 6

          0

          Jaab comment’s is where the rubber hits the road. Farmer and Scherer there’s been lots of comments about the absenteeism and then seems the Johnson swipe cards get a review. The message gets through imho.

  3. 4

    0

    Let me get this straight. The newspaper article says Judge Farmer’s worth 4.7 mil and he’s arguing about how expensive a suspension is? Seriously?

  4. 0

    0

    “No correct record” of the Friday dockets? Is this for real. And which Judges are going to testify they swiped him in with their cards?

      1. 0

        1

        Was he in his Chambers before it started or was he being swiped in by other tardy judges at 930am?

  5. 1

    0

    Oct 1 ’23 through Sept 30 ’24 there’s about 249 work days and they’re saying he missed 100 of them?

    1. 1

      0

      If that’s accurate there’s no way the Supremes can keep him because of the precedent it would set not to mention all the dirty talk.

    1. 0

      0

      I’m wondering what they wanted to talk to him about in the meeting he cancelled. Also, I’m wondering who was the lawyer he fired. Is that information available.

  6. 1

    0

    Throughout this
    entire period his only relief, and the best part of his day, was his time in court where
    he believed he was serving a public good and a noble cause. These brief respites of
    time provided an outlet to feel good about his life and what he was doing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Upload