50 thoughts on “PICK 6”

    1. 9

      0

      Yeah, someone should tell new judge Maria Weeks to look at what our viewers had to say about her last month when she presided over Magistrate Court No problem seeing she sides with the state.

      People are getting educated by us, not tracked and sold to.
      Robe Fever? Or she doesn’t realize how shallow she comes off as.
      SFC, A Different Approach.

        1. 0

          1

          Nah she’s married to Johnny Weekes. He’s banged every public defender and prosecuter & hooker in Broward County 😂😂😂😂 Good guy. She’s perfect for him.

  1. 3

    1

    Randy Katz went to Duke Law and Patrick Scott is a double domer. DeSantis is Yale/Harvard. Something to watch. Pedigree likes pedigree.

    1. 1

      0

      Bill where can the public view the applications of the 6 picks? Duke Law School is impressive. I would love to know where the other six went to law school. It would be great to have someone with an Ivey League background be on the bench.

        1. 1

          0

          Duke is ranked #10 nationally. By US News. If Katz is appointed it will only be as a pit stop on the way to the Federal Bench.

  2. 0

    0

    Bill where can the public view the applications of the 6 picks? Duke Law School is impressive. I would love to know where the other six went to law school. It would be great to have someone with an Ivey League background be on the bench.

      1. 7

        0

        Thomas Cooley- voted “worst law school” more than 10 years in a row.

        ” David Frakt, who serves as chair of the National Advisory Council for Law School Transparency, writes that 2017 defending champion Thomas Cooley Law School repeats for 2018, claiming the number 1 spot on the list of bottom 10 schools. According to his analysis, Cooley enrolled at least 135 students with LSATs at 139 or below, the bottom 12 percent of all LSAT takers.”

        Which applicant admitted to going to this bottom ranked school? Do tell.

    1. 9

      1

      Its time to end the Nova mediocre stranglehold on the Bench.
      Wondering why there’s so much embarrassment in 17th?
      Look no further.
      Governor Desantis will save the 17th.

      1. 1

        2

        But some people can get into good schools but can’t afford to pay for a full price school so that should be considered too before passing judgment on Nova.

        1. 6

          0

          What’s the big deal? Nova is perfect for the mediocre judges we’ve got on the bench in Broward. These are people that can’t do anything else but pull down the slim pickens they get for lack of any real legal talent.

        2. 4

          0

          Hello? Nova is a bottom tier, expensive, private school. I think UM is the same price. The only people who go to Nova, go because they can’t get in anywhere else. (Except for St. Thomas which is the lowest of the low, they all got in there.) unless they went to law school later in life and had a family down here. Other than that Nova sharks need to stop circling our Judiciary!

  3. 6

    1

    Davis couldn’t handle the public defenders at first appearance court and ran for the hills and he should be promoted why?

  4. 3

    0

    Politics and Affirmative Action dictate the deplorable state of local misfits here in Broward. Everybody knows it. Few want to talk about it. We all suffer the consequences of it.

    1. 3

      0

      The Affirmative Action group always gives the appearance that the Muppet’s have arrived. Its not race. Its the gender wars conducted by the toxic Court Cunts of Cuntopia.

  5. 3

    1

    It should be embarrassing to be picked when you know it’s only because of politics and when you know everyone so clearly sees that you don’t deserve it. But I guess you need to be capable of having shame to be embarrassed.

  6. 7

    0

    Why are we filling our judiciary with subpar law school alumni??? Seriously- the exception not the norm should be only appointing top 100 (tier 1 and 2) law school graduates to the bench. (FYI the only top 100 law schools (top 2 tiers) in Florida are UF, FSU, and UM.) If you apply from a 4th tier school: Nova, St. Thomas and a bunch of other scam law schools, then you should submit your LSATs and transcripts. Maybe we should get all applicants’ school records. Did they pass the Bar the first time? Being a judge should mean that you are the creme de la creme of our profession. Some of these nominees meet that standard. Others, I wonder was their school even accredited? (Come on- law schools with night classes) 🙄

    1. 2

      1

      Seriously? A grad from a good school makes more than a Judge the first year out. The judiciary takes what it can get.

      1. 3

        0

        I’m thankful there are those among us willing to work for law degree minimum wage, rubber chicken dinners and tacky plaques from voluntary Bar Associations.

    2. 2

      0

      Correction: Stetson and FIU are both in top 100 too! Wow FIU is moving up. Now there is no excuse to go to Nova or St. Thomas!

      1. 6

        0

        The courthouse is dominated by Nova culture. The majority of the interns come from there. They hire on. They work the network to get on the bench. They ad junct there to boost their modest salaries and recruit interns. If change is on order then interns from other schools need to be strongly recruited. This will be difficult. In a strong economy those from the ranked schools will invariably take high paying jobs instead.

    3. 2

      0

      Because that is how they maintain the “network corruption” for Satz, many of whom started out and were trained in His orifice.

  7. 3

    0

    If you went to a less than stellar school, you can prove yourself with your accomplishments and your impeccable work. If you’re smart and work hard, you should be able to go very far.
    But if you went to a low ranked school and also do lousy work, you have no business being on that list. And if the committee picks you, they are truly failing to do their job.

  8. 4

    0

    A Yale Law School education is far superior.
    The handlers there tech how to usurp the law against the public.

    1. Yale Law School teaches how to accept as evidence visibly altered, redacted, and counterfeited (“police report”, not on file with any LE,) for our popular pay for play private contractor to support a 12.980 form to protect Jeffrey Epstein’s court house friends.

    2. Yale Law School teaches how to help invent Invisible petitioners/witnesses for our pay for play contractors, witnesses that are named in court orders, but don’t even know.

    3. Yale Law School teaches Invisible petitioners/witnesses are very important. They are needed to support intentional frauds using emails of the fictional and invisible plaintiff’s, to support the pay for play contractor’s fraud upon the court. It comes in handy when you’re a judge who “invents evidence from the from the bench, using the invisible, and transpose it to our pay for play contractors, and thereby preventing theft/frauds any many other felonies from being revealed.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_and_Bones

    1. 3

      0

      Where Are They Hiding Geronimo’s Skull?

      Anderson is convinced that the skull has been used in wierd fraternity rituals at Yale University since about 1918 after it was taken from Geronimo’s grave at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, by Prescott Bush, the grandfather of Republican presidential candidate George W. Bush.

      http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread286601/pg1

  9. 5

    0

    Do a full inquiry on broward county case#: 18002120MM20A.

    I see that this case was never disposed despite the fact that the defendant never waived speedy trial which expired on February 13th, 2019 ( 90 days after he was placed in custody via summons on November 15th, 2018) and the defendant filed a notice of expiration on March 7th, 2019. This is Now 02/06/2020… How is this case still active? Even if a valid trial had occurred….

    What about the mandate for mistrials provided in Fla.Crim.R.P 3.191 (m)?

    See…(m) Effect of Mistrial: A person who is to be tried again shall be brought to trial within 90 days from the date of declaration of a mistrial by the trial court. If a defendant is not brought to trial within the prescribed time periods, the defendant shall be entitled to the appropriate remedy as set forth in subdivision (p).

    Also I thought that pursuant to Fla.Crim.R.P 3.191 (n) states that if a conviction or withheld adjudication has not been obtained during this period that the defendant is entitled to discharge.

    I also see that the defendant asked for a standby attorney prior to his trial at and on January 31st, 2019 (based on the record) and the judge denied the defendants request for standby attorney… only to later cause a mistrial by the defendant requesting during the trial for an attorney…

    … Isnt that bad faith conduct by Judge Diaz for “goading” a defendant into a mistrial by his own bad faith conduct?

    a judge should use caution in denying standby counsel, because a defendant may waive the right to self-representation if the defendant later abandons his or her initial request to proceed pro se. Brown v. Wainwright, 665 F.2d 607, 611 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc). The trial judge is not required to allow a nonlawyer to assist a pro se defendant in lieu of a licensed attorney. See Bauer v. State, 610 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

    Part of the job of standby counsel is to be ready to take over the defense of the case if the defendant withdraws a request to proceed pro se, or if the court terminates the defendant’s right to proceed pro se.

    Prepare as if you are going to take over the defense? – See United States v. Hagen, 468 F. App’ 373, 388-890 (4th Cir. 2012) (appointing as standby counsel attorney who had been representing defendant and ordering counsel “to continue preparing for trial as if he were trying the case” and to “assist defendant if and when and to the extent called upon by defendant”). r

    Based on that theory double jeopardy attaches to that mistrial.

    The Double Jeopardy Clause BARS RETRIALS in which there is bad faith conduct by the Judge or Prosecutor.

    See United States v. Jorn, supra, at 485 ( 91 S. ct., at 557) also See United States v. Dinitz, 424 U. S., at 611, 96 S.ct., at 1081.See Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667 (1982)

    Also if he had a mistrial isn’t he entitled to a trial in 90 days pursuant to Fla.Crim.R.P 3.191 (m)

    Again due to bad faith conduct by the judge because whatever lawyer that got appointed to the case following a mistrial will only have 90 days to get acquainted with an extremely detailed case and clean up or fix anything a NON lawyer (such as a pro se defendant) may commonly mess up on. All of that could have been avoided originally when the defendant requested standby counsel at his arraignment on January 10th, 2019 and the record also reflects on January 31st, 2019.

    The judge could have foreseen this highly probable issue approaching but still denied the defendants request in “BAD FAITH”

    I got this from the defendants Motion to Discharge he filed on February 3rd, 2020:

    On January 31st, 2019 the record (Motion to Dismiss Hearing) reflects that the defendant previously requested a “Standby” Attorney.

    See transcripts Page 14 line 19-24. Judge Diaz on his OWN FAITH stated: “No, I don’t think that’s fair to the attorney.” … On Page 15 “line 1- 3” Judge Diaz further explains why stating verbatim: “Because they have a license. They have to protect and they can’t really represent you if they’re on standby.”

    I think this case is a very good case to review the blatant disregard for any laws, rules, statutes, etc by the judge…. Was it intentional to deceive the “pro se defendant” that is not how the law works? Deception is prohibited by the florida bar and is unethical.

    This case is very exhausting and confusing so it takes a lot of analytical skills just to catch the flaws… this case is just lingering on out of malice not justice. This is corruption.This defendant really doesn’t have a fair chance of getting his due process.

    Debatable?

    1. 1

      0

      SOP for Satz, the 17t Cir and the 4th which when in doubt, simply PCAs without and “expressed” opinion to “finalize” protection of misconduct, criminal misconduct and erroneous and wrongful results to obstruct appeal– simply put” Fraud Upon the Court where the court routinely simply obstructs the state’s lawful processes from being accessed and taking place.

Leave a Reply to LOL - COOLEY LAW GRAD Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.